[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *Occur in buf*?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: *Occur in buf*? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 21:10:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 02:15:01AM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> Alternatively, always name the buffer *Occur*, but provide a occur-save-buffer
> command (bound to `s') which renames the buffer to *Occur: buffer*; then the
> user can easily save precious occur buffers on a needed basis.
As I noted, there already is such a command -- it's called `clone-buffer'.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
Re: *Occur in buf*?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Benjamin Rutt, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/27
- Re: *Occur in buf*?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/29
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/31
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/31
Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/28