[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
From: |
Alan Shutko |
Subject: |
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:45:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> What about the above comment, though? If the DOC issue is a bug, I'd
> be happy to see if I can fix it. I'd rather spend the time on that
> than on some less appropriate hack.
The DOC files do differ between compiles. If you ./configure and then
./configure --without-x, you'll see a .1 and a .2. Emacs will
normally use those correctly. (The files do differ... try diffing or
swapping them and trying them from Emacs...
C-n runs the command next-line
which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple'.
(next-line ARG)
ion of the current buffer to be copied.
) But if you did two separate clean builds, the build id in the
version would be the same and they would use the same file, and have
problems... I think it uses offsets or something.
I tried this with 21.2.90.
--
Alan Shutko <address@hidden> - In a variety of flavors!
Even a hawk is an eagle among crows.
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/01
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Alan Shutko, 2002/06/01
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/01
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/10
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.,
Alan Shutko <=
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Stefan Monnier, 2002/06/10
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Alan Shutko, 2002/06/10
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/11
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Alan Shutko, 2002/06/11
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/12
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/06/13
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/13