[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: fontsets in 21.3]
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
address@hidden: fontsets in 21.3] |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:14:46 -0600 (MDT) |
Can you investigate this and explain the problem
so someone else can write a fix?
------- Start of forwarded message -------
To: address@hidden
Subject: fontsets in 21.3
From: Dave Love <address@hidden>
Date: 07 Jun 2002 12:18:40 +0100
Sender: Dave Love <address@hidden>
I don't know whether there's a reasonable solution, but the fontset
definitions in 21.2/3 give bad results in XFree 4.1 (Debian testing),
at least.
First, fontset-standard now gets me sony-fixed (a fairly nasty serifed
font) for ascii and latin-1. It (and fontset-default) also gets
useless iso-10646 fonts to display mule-unicode characters; XFree 4.1
has most of its fonts recoded to 10646 with a repertoire which
typically only covers a subset of Latin.
For general 10646 coverage (including the technical symbols I want),
only gnu-unifont fits the bill as far as I know, so perhaps that
should be named explicitly.
------- End of forwarded message -------
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- address@hidden: fontsets in 21.3],
Richard Stallman <=