[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2002 15:14:02 -0600 (MDT) |
in src/indent.c `current_column', ^N and \NNN are presently hard coded
as taking 2 and 4 columns, respectively.
Currently the functions in indent.c don't handle variable width fonts at all.
Extending them to do so is an important project. When that is done, I expect
it won't be too hard to handle these two cases also.
- display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/23
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/25
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/26