[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apropos commands and regexps
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Apropos commands and regexps |
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2002 07:51:18 +0300 (IDT) |
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > I don't like the "and" approach -- at least not as the default.
>
> I'm afraid anything else will bring too many hits.
>
> The rule that at least two of the keywords must match
> should not bring too many hits, I would think.
An example with two words discussed here brought about 70 hits, which
IMHO is too many.
Moreover, I think a rule based on the number of matched keywords is not
good enough, since sometimes even one word is enough to yield a very
accurate result. Try "M-x apropos bell RET", for example.
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, (continued)
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/17
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/17
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Miles Bader, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/17
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/18
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/15
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/16
- Message not available
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/17
Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/12