[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:07:51 +0300 (IDT) |
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> We should probably try to split it into
> "likely" and "unlikely" options. Where the cut-off point should be,
> I don't know
The language environment might bring this information somehow.
> (non-MIME coding-systems should be in the "unlikely" list, tho).
Careful: this might not be true on Windows (cpNNN etc.).
> > Eg, I doubt most users _ever_ want to use the -with-esc coding
> > systems. (As far as I can tell X Compound Text should serve the
> > purpose fine, and users can tell for sure that they don't know what it
> > does. The ISO-8859-with-esc are tempting for naive users as "the
> > closest to what I want").
>
> I don't even know why those systems exist.
Try to force Emacs to encode Latin-2 text as iso8859-1 (yes, this does
work!), and you will understand, I think ;-)
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, (continued)
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/04/28
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2002/04/28
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/28
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Miles Bader, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Miles Bader, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/04/29
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29