[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:22:33 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
>
> it could be that a mixture CRLFs with some extra CRs should be
> accepted as DOS-style.
Are we sure that Mac users (where a single CR is the EOL character)
won't object this?
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stephen Gildea, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/27
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/28
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/28