[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bindings reserved for users
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bindings reserved for users |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:49:03 +0300 (IDT) |
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> What is the correct way to typeset "i.e." in Texinfo source code?
> >
> > "i.e.@:". Without the "@:" part, TeX might typeset the second period
> > as an end of a sentence (slightly more whitespace).
>
> Or rephrasing it to say "foo, i.e., bar".
A comma after "i.e." is wrong punctuation, AFAIK.
> At least I have learned to do that when writing "e.g.".
Yes. But "e.g." is a different thing, it does require a comma.
> (The Cc line of this mail look really weird. Whose mailer is broken?
Mine :-( Or, more accurately, some interaction between RMAIL's `r'
command and feedmail I use to send the message. I need to find time to
debug the problem...
- bindings reserved for users, Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/17
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/18
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/18
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/20
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/22
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/22
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Simon Josefsson, 2002/04/22
- Re: bindings reserved for users,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/23
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/25
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/25
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Florian Weimer, 2002/04/26
- Re: bindings reserved for users, Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/23