[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-dat
From: |
Per Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:44:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> I think that's not the best solution for this problem, since there's
> already enough information to make such a connection automatically in
> the great majority of cases.
There are no conflict in doing both. Create automatic links when
possible, and additional manual links when not.
>> A more controversial solution would be to
>>
>> (defalias 'describe-variable 'customize-variable)
>
> Yes; that would be very bad.
>
> Customization buffers are filled with all sorts of crap that's
> completely unnecessary when you just want to see a quick description of
> a variable (which is about 99% of the time for me), which would distract
> greatly from the actual documentation (not to mention ballooning the
> size of help buffers to something absurd).
Then make describe-variable a function that called customize-variable
with a 'terse argument. Or bind a 'customize-terse' dynamic variable.
Most of the new cross-referencing functionality in Emacs 21 was
already part of the doc string widget used by customize. I think
duplicating the code just lead to inconsistencies and wasted effort.
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), (continued)
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Michael Toomim, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/21
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/21
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Simon Josefsson, 2002/04/21
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date),
Per Abrahamsen <=
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Simon Josefsson, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Simon Josefsson, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Richard Stallman, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Tutorials and Demos (Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Samuel Mikes, 2002/04/23
- Re: Tutorials and Demos, Robin S. Socha, 2002/04/24
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Andy Piper, 2002/04/19