[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:11:10 -0700 (MST) |
What about changing the buffer name rather than the mode-line-process, ie.
*IELM on test.el*
or
*IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero**
In case there is more than one IELM buffer pointing at the same
long-named buffer, it would be important to uniquify the names in
a somewhat special way. The difference between
*IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** and
*IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero**<2>
would not be visible in the mode line.
- ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28