[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:16:37 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Also, the INSTALL file should probably tell where can one find GNU
> > TLS, if it isn't already installed.
>
> This was part of the patch I sent, I think.
You are right, I missed it; sorry.
> > > +(defconst gnutls-e-interrupted -52)
> > > +(defconst gnutls-e-again -28)
> >
> > Are these constants system-independent?
>
> I'm not sure. I'll try to understand the GNU TLS code. If these were
> defined in C, this wouldn't be a problem (there are C #define's in
> gnutls.h), so maybe I should move them to C.
The reason I asked is that the names are similar to C constants EINTR and
EAGAIN. These are defined to system-dependent constant values which are
put into the global variable `errno' whenever the respective problems
happen. If these are indeed errno values, they shouldn't be in Lisp,
because the underlying C library can change the values (though most
libraries don't).
- Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/03
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/04
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/04
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/07
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/08
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/09
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/10
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Florian Weimer, 2002/02/13
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/10
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/04