[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:36:01 -0700 (MST) |
So maybe table.el could use command remapping instead of advice (or
wrappers).
That would be a very clean method, if it is applicable. Much cleaner
than using wrappers, and without the confusion risk that advice
brings.
Why do I say "if it is applicable"? Because this method, unlike
advice or wrappers, won't affect calls from Lisp code.
Tak, is it crucial to change what these functions do when called from
Lisp code? Or are you concerned only with interactive calls?
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Tak Ota, 2002/01/24
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/25
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Tak Ota, 2002/01/26
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/26
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/01/27
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Tak Ota, 2002/01/28
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Tak Ota, 2002/01/29
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/29
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Tak Ota, 2002/01/29
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/30
- Re: table.el and GNU Emacs integration?, Tak Ota, 2002/01/27