[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
26 Nov 2001 16:35:32 +0900 |
Tak Ota <address@hidden> writes:
> I found 2 types for prompt messages.
>
> 1. "prompt: (default %s) "
> 2. "prompt (default %s): "
>
> For example, `switch-to-buffer' is the type 1 and `describe-function'
> is the type 2. Do you think I should follow the type 1? Should all
> type 2 be corrected to type 1? To find the answer I opened the info
> buffer to search in the elisp manual then learned that `Info-search'
> was the type 2.
I prefer type 1 (I think it's the only one that's hardwired into C code),
and while I think the code should be made more uniform at some point, it's
not very important, since they both are pretty obvious.
So, yes, I think you should use type 1, but I'm curious to hear what
other people think about it.
-Miles
--
`Cars give people wonderful freedom and increase their opportunities.
But they also destroy the environment, to an extent so drastic that
they kill all social life' (from _A Pattern Language_)
- table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/24
- Re: table.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/24
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/24
- Re: table.el, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/27