[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if b
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed] |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Nov 2001 19:27:53 -0500 |
> When your papers arrive, I will install these changes.
> Could you send me the combined change that I should install?
I think you misunderstood. The last patch he sent, which only
changes the (kill-buffer ...) to (unless (kill-buffer ...) (error ...))
is the whole patch.
It clearly doesn't require any papers,
Stefan "who seem to have deleted that email already"
- address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Richard Stallman, 2001/11/16
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/16
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Juanma Barranquero, 2001/11/16
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/16
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Juanma Barranquero, 2001/11/16
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed],
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: address@hidden: Wrong behavior of bs-delete, bs-delete-backward if buffer is not actually killed], Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/18