[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC check-in and window configuration
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: VC check-in and window configuration |
Date: |
14 Nov 2001 23:38:29 +0900 |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> My current "best" idea is to extend the notion of dedicated window
> to allow a "soft" for of dedication: a soft-dedicated window still
> allows things like `switch-to-buffer' (at which point it goes back
> to non-dedicated).
....
> This way
>
> (progn
> (pop-to-buffer buf)
> (bury-buffer))
>
> should not change the window configuration.
Why should `switch-to-buffer' make a window non-dedicated, but
`bury-buffer' not? How are they different? I certainly use them both
in a similar way...
-Miles
--
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
--Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research
Re: VC check-in and window configuration, Colin Walters, 2001/11/14
Re: VC check-in and window configuration, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/15