[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --program-suffix
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: --program-suffix |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:26:53 -0700 (MST) |
OK, I will leave it, but you did not answered my question: should this
alternative name be GNUecams21-21.1.50 or GNUecams-21.1.50-21?
I think it should be the latter, because that is what results from
applying the specified transformation rules to the standard name
emacs-21.1.50.
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/05
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/09
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/10
- Re: --program-suffix, Andreas Schwab, 2001/11/10
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/11
- Re: --program-suffix, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2001/11/11
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/11
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/13
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/13
Please help developing Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/11
Re: Please help developing Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
Re: Please help developing Emacs, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/11/12