[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macro CHECK_NUMBER?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Macro CHECK_NUMBER? |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2001 17:50:05 -0500 |
> From: address@hidden (Pavel Janík)
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:46:16 +0100
>
> > > #define CHECK_NUMBER(x, i) \
> > > do { if (!INTEGERP ((x))) x = wrong_type_argument (Qintegerp,
> (x)); } while (0)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > If someone wants to remove them, at this point I would say ok.
> >
> > I will take care of it.
>
> While doing that: can I broke CVS compilation (and save *a lot* of
> commits/work) for about 20 minutes (for committing) or should I introduce
> temporary macros and do the real conversion twice without breaking the
> compilation? In both cases, I will do that completely on weekend...
I personally don't care if it's broken during a few minutes (after
all it can also happen mistakenly ;-), but I fail to see why it's
necessary: you can commit all the files in one shot.
Stefan