[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?
From: |
Pavel Janík |
Subject: |
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:53:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50 |
From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:27:29 +0200 (IST)
Hi,
> > this function is defined twice inside fileio.c The second instance is
> > commented in #if 0 and seems to me very similar to the one in use. Can
> > I delete it? We have it in CVS so I see no problem in it. This applies to
> > almost every code we have in #if 0...
>
> Some of the #if 0'ed functions give a doc string because it's too long
> for some preprocessors.
yes, I take care of this while converting into new style of doc-strings
(and I am in fact removing such occurrences automatically). I double check
my effort by ediffing new and old DOC files. But this is not an issue
here. This function is not and DEFUN:
#if 0
/* Changed this DEFUN to a DEAFUN, so as not to confuse `make-docfile'. */
DEAFUN ("expand-file-name", Fexpand_file_name, Sexpand_file_name, 1, 2, 0,
"Convert FILENAME to absolute, and canonicalize it.\n\
--
Pavel Janík
rm -rf /usr/local/lib/xemacs /usr/local/bin/xemacs .emacs `find / -name
\*emacs\*`
-- address@hidden in alt.religions.vim
- expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Miles Bader, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?,
Pavel Janík <=
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/22
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/22
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/24
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/25
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/22