[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: naming convention for faces?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: naming convention for faces? |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:06:17 +0200 (IST) |
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Miles Bader wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > I don't think it's redundant: it's useful for searching with `apropos',
> > and, in general, tells volumes about the variable's purpose.
>
> Well that's the thing -- they aren't variables.
??? Does ELisp have something beyond functions and variables? If not,
anything that's not a function is a variable.
> It's like calling all variables `foo-variable'.
I don't think the analogy is accurate: Lisp already knows about the
difference between functions and variables, so the user can differentiate
between them by using different commands (apropos-command vs
apropos-variable, etc.).