|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#34824: closed ([PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series) |
Date: | Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:12:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:10:44 +0100 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: [bug#34824] [PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34824, regarding [PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 34824: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34824 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: [PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:16:15 +0100 Hey Guix, this patch series changes libdrm and Mesa to use Meson. A few notes to go along with the patches: Patch #1: Libdrm on Github mentions that Autotools is the legacy build system for libdrm, so it seems better to change this to use Meson. Patch #2: Mesa is gonna drop support for Autotools entirely at some point in 2019, so it seems good to make the switch sooner rather than later. I think I converted all the configure flags to the new format. Patches #3-6: For some reason these packages now need an explicit mesa input. I haven't run into other packages that have this problem yet.0001-gnu-libdrm-Switch-to-meson-build-system.patch
Description: Text Data0002-gnu-mesa-Switch-to-meson-build-system.patch
Description: Text Data0003-gnu-libsmpeg-Add-mesa-input.patch
Description: Text Data0004-gnu-sdl-image-Add-mesa-input.patch
Description: Text Data0005-gnu-sdl-mixer-Add-mesa-input.patch
Description: Text Data0006-gnu-sdl-net-Add-mesa-input.patch
Description: Text DatapgpHHhAYo3Xd6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: [bug#34824] [PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:10:44 +0100 Done, along with an update to 18.3.5. On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:50:07 +0100 Marius Bakke <address@hidden> wrote: > Rutger Helling <address@hidden> writes: > > > I think you're right! Changing mesa from a regular input to a > > propogated one seems to have fixed all the issues for SDL. I no > > longer need patches 3-6. See below for what we can use instead. Can > > I push the patches now? > > Well, we still don't know *why* it is needed :-) > > Could you add a comment about where it comes from (e.g. pkg-config or > the .la files) and squash this commit with the Mesa patch? LGTM with > that change, thanks!pgpFcuYbFdBm7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |