[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[debbugs-tracker] bug#33398: closed (26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi G
From: |
GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: |
[debbugs-tracker] bug#33398: closed (26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:03:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 01:01:00 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#33398: 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B,
default setting suggestion
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33398,
regarding 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)
--
33398: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33398
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:58:13 +1100 |
Hello,
This is a suggestion for a reasonable default fore/background color combo.
Run:
emacs -Q
See:
Customize Group: Hi Lock Faces
Hi Green B
I see:
foreground:green1
background:white (which I guess is a received setting from somewhere else)
For me, this is a very difficult combo to see.
I’d like to suggest the default to be for `Hi Green B':
foreground:darkcyan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#33398: 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Dec 2018 01:01:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> > (defface hi-redgold
>> > '((((min-colors 8)) (:background "red"))
>> > (t (:background "gold")))
>> > "Face for hi-lock mode."
>> > :group 'hi-lock-faces)
>> >
>> > I see no reason to use "red" on 16-color terminals, nor "orange" on
>> > color TTYs with at least 88 colors. The translation of "gold" should
>> > be good enough in those cases. Isn't it?
>>
>> I tried, and it used "red" even on 88-colors.
>
> I don't have access to such a terminal, but on a 16-color TTY "gold"
> displays as bright yellow, which is definitely not red. So I'm
> surprised you see red on a 88-color TTY.
Actually, I meant that I see red on a 88-color graphical display.
>> But given that LightSalmon is a good choice, I copied the same
>> definitions from other faces, substituted with new colors and they
>> look good on all environments:
>>
>> (defface hi-salmon
>> '((((min-colors 88) (background dark))
>> (:background "light salmon" :foreground "black"))
>> (((background dark)) (:background "red" :foreground "black"))
>> (((min-colors 88)) (:background "light salmon"))
>> (t (:background "red")))
>> "Face for hi-lock mode."
>> :group 'hi-lock-faces)
>>
>> (defface hi-aquamarine
>> '((((min-colors 88) (background dark))
>> (:background "aquamarine" :foreground "black"))
>> (((background dark)) (:background "blue" :foreground "black"))
>> (((min-colors 88)) (:background "aquamarine"))
>> (t (:background "blue")))
>> "Face for hi-lock mode."
>> :group 'hi-lock-faces)
>
> Thanks.
Installed to master and closed. It seems there is no need to update NEWS
because the users will see themselves two new colors added.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [debbugs-tracker] bug#33398: closed (26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion),
GNU bug Tracking System <=