emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#33398: closed (26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi G


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#33398: closed (26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:03:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 01:01:00 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#33398: 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, 
default setting suggestion
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33398,
regarding 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
33398: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33398
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:58:13 +1100
Hello,

This is a suggestion for a reasonable default fore/background color combo.

Run: 
  emacs -Q

See:
  Customize Group: Hi Lock Faces
  Hi Green B

I see:
  foreground:green1 
  background:white (which I guess is a received setting from somewhere else)

For me, this is a very difficult combo to see. 

I’d like to suggest the default to be for `Hi Green B':

  foreground:darkcyan




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#33398: 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 01:01:00 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>> > (defface hi-redgold
>> >   '((((min-colors 8)) (:background "red"))
>> >     (t (:background "gold")))
>> >   "Face for hi-lock mode."
>> >   :group 'hi-lock-faces)
>> >
>> > I see no reason to use "red" on 16-color terminals, nor "orange" on
>> > color TTYs with at least 88 colors.  The translation of "gold" should
>> > be good enough in those cases.  Isn't it?
>>
>> I tried, and it used "red" even on 88-colors.
>
> I don't have access to such a terminal, but on a 16-color TTY "gold"
> displays as bright yellow, which is definitely not red.  So I'm
> surprised you see red on a 88-color TTY.

Actually, I meant that I see red on a 88-color graphical display.

>> But given that LightSalmon is a good choice, I copied the same
>> definitions from other faces, substituted with new colors and they
>> look good on all environments:
>>
>> (defface hi-salmon
>>   '((((min-colors 88) (background dark))
>>      (:background "light salmon" :foreground "black"))
>>     (((background dark)) (:background "red" :foreground "black"))
>>     (((min-colors 88)) (:background "light salmon"))
>>     (t (:background "red")))
>>   "Face for hi-lock mode."
>>   :group 'hi-lock-faces)
>>
>> (defface hi-aquamarine
>>   '((((min-colors 88) (background dark))
>>      (:background "aquamarine" :foreground "black"))
>>     (((background dark)) (:background "blue" :foreground "black"))
>>     (((min-colors 88)) (:background "aquamarine"))
>>     (t (:background "blue")))
>>   "Face for hi-lock mode."
>>   :group 'hi-lock-faces)
>
> Thanks.

Installed to master and closed.  It seems there is no need to update NEWS
because the users will see themselves two new colors added.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]