emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#32287: closed ([PATCH] Reproducible svn checkouts)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#32287: closed ([PATCH] Reproducible svn checkouts)
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:53:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2018 17:52:06 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#32287] [PATCH] Reproducible svn checkouts
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32287,
regarding [PATCH] Reproducible svn checkouts
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
32287: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32287
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Reproducible svn checkouts Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:36:33 +0200
Some svn checkouts have sub-repositories that have their own .svn
folder. These folders contain timestamps, so this patch removes
every .svn folder in the result of the checkout, instead of only the
top-level one.

Attachment: 0001-guix-svn-Remove-all-.svn-folders.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#32287] [PATCH] Reproducible svn checkouts Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 17:52:06 +0200
Le Sun, 29 Jul 2018 15:59:03 +0200,
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) a écrit :

> Hi Julien,
> 
> Julien Lepiller <address@hidden> skribis:
> 
> > Some svn checkouts have sub-repositories that have their own .svn
> > folder. These folders contain timestamps, so this patch removes
> > every .svn folder in the result of the checkout, instead of only the
> > top-level one.  
> 
> Ouch, good catch.
> 
> Did you find packages that would trigger this issue?  We should
> somehow check all the packages that use ‘svn-fetch’ when we merge
> this patch, and update hashes as needed.
> 

No package in Guix trigger this issue, but I have a package definition
for JOSM that does. The patch doesn't change the content of sources
using svn-fetch we have, so there's nothing to worry about.

Pushed as dd1e45335e135fe724acece440782344ef8ca9fd in staging with
your suggestions. And now I wonder why I pushed to staging since it
doesn't change any existing package... too late I guess :)

Thank you!



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]