[debbugs-tracker] bug#32171: closed (Update: Erlang and Elixir)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:35:45 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#32171] Update: Erlang and Elixir
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32171,
regarding Update: Erlang and Elixir
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
32171: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32171
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Update: Erlang and Elixir Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:07:30 +0000

These 3 patches update Erlang and Elixir to the latest versions.

0001-mailmap-Add-another-line-for-myself.patch
Description: Text document

0002-gnu-erlang-Update-to-21.0.patch
Description: Text document

0003-gnu-elixir-Update-to-1.6.6.patch
Description: Text document

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#32171] Update: Erlang and Elixir
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:35:45 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 660 bytes:
> >> Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> skribis:
> >> 
> >> > Okay, before I leave I've --check build the package again, at most
> >> > built with make -j4... Can you try and build it with less cores?
> >> 
> >> If you suspect a parallelism issue, could you check whether other
> >> distros have patches along these lines, or whether
> >> #:parallel-builds? #f gives us something that works reproducibly?
> >
> > parallel-build set to #f does gives us a reproducible elixir package.
>
> Indeed, #:parallel-tests? #f is enough actually.  So I added that and
> committed the update.
>
> It would be nice if you could take a closer look at the
> bit-reproducibility issue, but we’ll do that separately.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---