[debbugs-tracker] bug#31159: closed (Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:46:00 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#31159: #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31159,
regarding Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
31159: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31159
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 20:20:27 -0700

Hi!

This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old
configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent
generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations.

Currently it lists generation 1 as the first entry in the list, and if
I've got 50+ generations installed and I don't want to boot the current
generation, I'm most likely going to want to revert to one of the more
recent generations rather than the very oldest.


live well,
  vagrant

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#31159: #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:46:00 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I tought this one was pushed and told Clément it was ok to push, my
> mistake! I just pushed it, so I close the ticket now.
>
> To people used to select bootloader entries with shortcuts, be aware
> that at next reconfigure, the entries will be reversed on all
> bootloaders (top of the list => most recent configuration).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
> > reopen 31159
> > tags 31159 - fixed
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi Clément,
> >
> > According to our bug tracking system, you added the "fixed" tag to bug
> > 31159 and closed it.  I think this must have been a mistake.  Did you
> > intend to close a different bug?  This bug has to do with the fact that
> > the order of old grub.cfg entries should arguably be reversed.
> >
> >        Mark
> >
> >
> > Vagrant Cascadian <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> On 2018-05-31, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:
> >>> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
> >>> #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries,
> >>> which was filed against the guix package.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed.
> >>> You can view the full report at
> >>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31159
> >>
> >> I don't see that the proposed patch was applied to any of the guix
> >> branches I'm aware of. Has it been merged and just not yet been pushed?
> >> Does it need to go to guix-patches instead of guix-bugs?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> live well,
> >>   vagrant
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---