emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#31254: closed (gnu: qemu: Build with Python 3 and


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#31254: closed (gnu: qemu: Build with Python 3 and SDL 2. (+ GTK 3 frontend))
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:55:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:54:40 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#31254] gnu: qemu: Build with Python 3 and SDL 2. (+ 
GTK 3 frontend) v3
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31254,
regarding gnu: qemu: Build with Python 3 and SDL 2. (+ GTK 3 frontend)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
31254: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31254
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: gnu: qemu: Build with Python 3 and SDL 2. (+ GTK 3 frontend) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:33:46 +0200
Hey Guix,

I saw QEMU was just updated to 2.12. I noticed a few things in the
release notes, namely:
* QEMU can now be built with Python 3.
* Support for SDL 1.2 is considered deprecated and will be removed
  entirely in a future release.

As a result, the first patch builds QEMU with Python 3 and SDL 2.

The second patch is optional and adds the GTK 3 frontend, which IMO
is a nice alternative to the SDL frontend.
This does increase the size of QEMU a bit. OTOH it seems unlikely that
most people who use QEMU don't already have GTK 3 installed in some
form.

Attachment: 0001-gnu-qemu-Build-with-Python-3-and-SDL-2.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: 0002-gnu-qemu-Enable-GTK-3-frontend.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: pgpm8zN9ipfT8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#31254] gnu: qemu: Build with Python 3 and SDL 2. (+ GTK 3 frontend) v3 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:54:40 +0200
I pushed the patches. Thanks again for the help!

On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:22:54 +0200
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> wrote:

> Rutger Helling <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Thanks again! I've made the changes, so here's another set of
> > patches. Note that the second patch is unchanged, just rebased.  
> 
> Excellent.  Both patches LGTM.  Thanks!

Attachment: pgpj8xTix41Ss.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]