[debbugs-tracker] bug#31135: closed (26.1; documentation of left-word and right-word are unclear)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:49:19 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#31135: 26.1; documentation of left-word and right-word 
are unclear
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31135,
regarding 26.1; documentation of left-word and right-word are unclear
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
31135: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31135
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 26.1; documentation of left-word and right-word are unclear
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:21:37 +0200
>
>
>
>
> The documentation strings for left-word and right-word both say:
>
>   Value is normally t.
>   If an edge of the buffer or a field boundary is reached, point is left there
>   there and the function returns nil.  Field boundaries are not noticed
>
>
> 1. Which value is normally t?
> 2. 'there' is repeated in the second sentence.
>
> Robert
>
> In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.18.9)
>  of 2018-04-12 built on rpluim-ubuntu
> Repository revision: c267421647510319d2a70554e42f0d1c394dba0a
> Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11804000
> System Description:     KDE neon LTS User Edition 5.12
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#31135: 26.1; documentation of left-word and right-word are unclear
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:49:19 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: address@hidden
> >> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 12:13:25 +0200
> >> 
> >> >> 2. 'there' is repeated in the second sentence.
> >> >
> >> > This kind of stuff needs to be fixed, no need to report it.
> >> 
> >> I found a few more repetitions like this [1], all in lisp
> >> docstrings. emacs-26 branch, I imagine?
> >
> > Yes, please.
>
> Done as 60e10c5031
> Closing.
>
> Robert
>
>
> --- End Message ---