emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#30384: closed (additional inputs required for Blen


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#30384: closed (additional inputs required for Blender plugins)
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 13:48:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2018 14:47:35 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30384: additional inputs required for Blender plugins
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30384,
regarding additional inputs required for Blender plugins
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30384: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30384
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: additional inputs required for Blender plugins Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:43:31 -0500
I was trying to install Sverchok plugin for Blender. It enables Blender
to change parameters in order to modify a wide range of values without
redrawing everything in case of a global change in something repetitive.

I checked the license. It is GPLv3. What else should i do to verify freedom?

When i tryed to install the Sverchok addon
https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Extensions:2.6/Py/Scripts/Nodes/Sverchok
http://nikitron.cc.ua/sverch/html/main.html
I got the message:
ImportError: No module named ‘numpy’
so i installed python-numpy.
And then i got error:
ImportError: No module named ‘requests’
I then instaled python-requests. Both these dependencies are mentioned in 
Sverchok's documentation.
The Blender binary ships with:
idna, chardet, urllib3, certifi, requests and numpy
https://git.blender.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi/blender.git/blob/HEAD:/build_files/build_environment/cmake/versions.cmake
It reports versions of numpy, requests and others
set(REQUESTS_VERSION 2.18.4)
set(NUMPY_VERSION v1.13.1)
set(NUMPY_SHORT_VERSION 1.13)
set(NUMPY_URI 
https://pypi.python.org/packages/c0/3a/40967d9f5675fbb097ffec170f59c2ba19fc96373e73ad47c2cae9a30aed/numpy-1.13.1.zip)
set(NUMPY_HASH 2c3c0f4edf720c3a7b525dacc825b9ae)

propagated-inputs

The NixOS package explicitly disables numpy at build time.

Those dependencies are not required for building the Guix package:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/graphics.scm?id=v0.14.0-1266-gd2a7170de#n79
It's better to just package these plugins separately rather than
propagating these (large) packages for every Blender user.
They are not necessary to run blender
https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Building_Blender/Linux/dependencies
It is just that Blender's oficial binary ships with those plugins and
their dependencies by default. We need not do the same. If the user
needs those addons, she may install them with Guix solving the
dependencies.

I was helped by:
<bzztploink>
<Yaniel>
from #blender
and:
<mbakke>
from the Guix.
Thank you very much!



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#30384: additional inputs required for Blender plugins Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 14:47:35 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Quiliro Ordonez Baca <address@hidden> skribis:

> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hello Quiliro,
>>
>> Quiliro Ordonez Baca <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> When i tryed to install the Sverchok addon
>>> https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Extensions:2.6/Py/Scripts/Nodes/Sverchok
>>> http://nikitron.cc.ua/sverch/html/main.html
>>> I got the message:
>>> ImportError: No module named ‘numpy’
>>> so i installed python-numpy.
>>> And then i got error:
>>> ImportError: No module named ‘requests’
>>> I then instaled python-requests. Both these dependencies are mentioned in 
>>> Sverchok's documentation.
>>
>> Since installing these two packages solves the problem,
>
> Oh! That is right. It is not a problem of Blender. It is a problem of
> dependencies of Sverchok. What is needed is a package definition for
> Sverchok. Am I right?

Not strictly required AIUI, but it wouldn’t hurt.

>> can we consider
>> this bug closed?
>
> Yes. Thank you. :-)

Done, thanks!

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]