emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#30186: closed (27.0.50; Password is not hidden in


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#30186: closed (27.0.50; Password is not hidden in read-passwd)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:19:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:10:06 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30186: 27.0.50; Password is not hidden in read-passwd
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30186,
regarding 27.0.50; Password is not hidden in read-passwd
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30186: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30186
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 27.0.50; Password is not hidden in read-passwd Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 23:29:35 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
This is a regression and a security flaw.

Reading a password with ‘read-passwd’ doesn't hide inserted characters
anymore as it used to do in older versions.

When the user has such customization:

  (custom-set-variables
   '(yank-excluded-properties t))

evaluating

  (read-passwd "Prompt: ")

and yanking a password to the minibuffer with 'C-y' doesn't hide it
as it did in Emacs 25.

This can be traced down to ‘remove-yank-excluded-properties’
where ‘set-text-properties’ used to leave ‘display’ properties
(with ‘.’ over inserted characters) in the minibuffer.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#30186: 27.0.50; Password is not hidden in read-passwd Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:10:06 +0000 User-agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Hello, Eli and Juri.

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 23:43:34 +0200, Juri Linkov wrote:
> >> So let's do that now.  I think the problem with read-passwd is a
> >> security issue, so it should go to emacs-26, do you agree?

> > Yes, i think it should go into emacs-26.

> > Juri, do you see any problem with just removing that
> > with-silent-modifications altogether?  I.e. this:

> I agree that removing with-silent-modifications would be
> the best fix.  Thanks for taking care of this.

Thanks.  I've made this change and committed it to the emacs-26 branch.

I'm closing the bug with this post.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]