--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
C-x b oc<TAB> couldn't find "*Occur*" buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:40:54 +0800 |
C-x b runs the command switch-to-buffer.
It usually is good guessing names via tab expansion, but today when I
typed
C-x b oc<TAB>
it couldn't find any buffer, so I had to do
C-x b Oc<TAB>
to be able to expand to the "*Occur*" buffer (that I created earlier
using M-x occur.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#29389: C-x b oc<TAB> couldn't find "*Occur*" buffer |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:00:32 +0200 |
> From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
> <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:52:34 +0800
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> >>>>> "JM" == John Mastro <address@hidden> writes:
> JM> 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> C-x b runs the command switch-to-buffer.
> JM> You just need to set read-buffer-completion-ignore-case to non-nil.
>
> Thanks! One would hope the switch-to-buffer document string would
> mention it...
It's mentioned in the doc string of read-buffer, which is used to read
and complete on buffer names. I've now added to the doc string of
switch-to-buffer a reference to read-buffer.
--- End Message ---