emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#27653: closed (25.2; ses.el text cell justificatio


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#27653: closed (25.2; ses.el text cell justification)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:56:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:54:39 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#27653: Patch for bug#27653: 25.2; ses.el text cell 
justification
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27653,
regarding 25.2; ses.el text cell justification
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
27653: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27653
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 25.2; ses.el text cell justification Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:02:24 +0200 User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
According to the SES manual, text cells are right-justified by
default. Justification can be changed by defining a printer function
("%s"). This worked as described in Emacs 24.5. In Emacs 25.2.1, all
text cells are left-justified, and I can't find a way to right-justify
them.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#27653: Patch for bug#27653: 25.2; ses.el text cell justification Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:54:39 +0300
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Gemini Lasswell <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
>         address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:18:43 -0400
> 
> > Stefan, the change in ses-print-cell that causes this bug is not
> > mentioned in the log message of df5703a00d.  Can you tell why you made
> > that change?
> 
> No, sorry.  That looks like a mess up on my part,

OK, thanks.  I've pushed Gemini's patch to the emacs-26 branch, and
I'm marking this bug done.

Btw, compiling ses.el emits 2 warnings:

  In toplevel form:
  ses.el:2475:1:Warning: Unused lexical argument `val'
  ses.el:2630:1:Warning: Unused lexical argument `val'

They look spot-on to me: the lambda forms there don't use 'val'.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]