emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#28310: closed (Grafting prevents build plan from b


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#28310: closed (Grafting prevents build plan from being displayed upfront)
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 12:44:01 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:42:55 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#28310: guix build -n misses package builds
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #28310,
regarding Grafting prevents build plan from being displayed upfront
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
28310: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28310
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: guix build -n misses package builds Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:03:34 +0200 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Hello,

I am right now in the process of updating pari-gp to version 2.9.3.
After building it on a git check-out of three days ago, which went smoothly,
I rebased my patch on today's master and was pleased to see that no rebuild
was needed:

$ ./pre-inst-env guix build pari-gp -n
outputs nothing.

However, once the -n dropped, the gd package gets built.
And then it is starting ruby, which has no connection to pari-gp:
Downloading 
https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/guix/nar/229n3pzp5bdmbdvwslg0dxliysas92k5-ruby-2.4.1.tar.xz...
   ruby-2.4.1.tar.xz  9.5MiB                                                    
                                                   22KiB/s 00:06 [              
      ]   1.3%^

Andreas




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#28310: guix build -n misses package builds Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:42:55 +0200 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> “-n” now implies “--no-grafts” (commit
> fd59105c49965db956fac73c68d8b00d068f5d5c).  This was motivated by the
> need to have -n really perform a dry run.
> 
> The downside is that with -n we now see only half of the build plan, and
> when we remove -n, we start with the other half of the build plan,
> grafting.
> 
> The “build continuation” idea of ‘wip-gexp-grafts’, discussed in
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/22990>, could in theory help with that.

Okay, so to simplify, I am closing this bug report.

Andreas



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]