emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#27649: closed (Update man-db to 2.7.6.1)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#27649: closed (Update man-db to 2.7.6.1)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 02:55:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:54:29 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#27649] Update man-db to 2.7.6.1
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27649,
regarding Update man-db to 2.7.6.1
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
27649: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27649
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Update man-db to 2.7.6.1 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 21:43:07 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
This updates man-db to the latest release, 2.7.6.1.

I tested that the manual-database profile hook still works. For that, I
had to pass the new configuration option 'disable-cache-owner', or else
the test suite and manpage database generation would fail.

See this commit for more info (Separate cache owner from --enable-setuid
option):

https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/man-db.git/commit/?id=0f8b5518949866075c25787bdc4e9c064597c21e

Attachment: 0001-gnu-man-db-Update-to-2.7.6.1-fixes-CVE-2015-1336.patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#27649] Update man-db to 2.7.6.1 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:54:29 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:53:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > +                       ;; Don't constrain ownership of system-wide cache 
> > files.
> > +                       ;; Otherwise creating the manpage database fails 
> > with
> > +                       ;; with man-db > 2.7.5.
> 
> Double 'with'. I'm not even sure the second sentence is necessary, YMMV :-)

It wasn't obvious to me that it should fail so I left it in, without
that extra 'with'.

Thanks for the review!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]