[debbugs-tracker] bug#27297: closed ([PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:18:11 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#27297: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27297,
regarding [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
27297: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27297
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:15:24 +0200
>
>
>
>
> From 82405dba978d051eb5ae9614a88f8a07f5fe1e85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20H=C3=B6fling?=
>  <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:57:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Correct function name.
> ---
>  doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index a5b7875..0b2aed2 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ In this example we have to know which modules
> define the @code{emacs} and @code{guile-2.0} variables to provide the
> right @code{use-package-modules} line, which can be cumbersome.  We can
>  instead provide regular package specifications and let
> address@hidden>package-output} look up the corresponding package
> address@hidden>package+output} look up the corresponding package
>  objects, like this:
>  
>  @example
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#27297: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:18:11 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi Björn,
>
> Björn Höfling <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > From 82405dba978d051eb5ae9614a88f8a07f5fe1e85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20H=C3=B6fling?=
> >  <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:57:55 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc: Correction of function name.
> >
> > * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Correct function name.
>
> Good catch… though the just-pushed commit
> c08ea55e7ec25261e4596bf6726a83c1ed056b94 introduces
> ‘specifications->manifest’ for this particular use case.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---