emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#27160: closed ([PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#27160: closed ([PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1.)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:46:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2017 17:45:32 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#27160: [PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27160,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
27160: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27160
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1. Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:05:34 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1
Dear Guix,

Here's a patch to update SCons.  I checked to make sure that the
packages that use SCons still build:
- linuxdcpp
- serf
- aria-maestosa
- pingus
- metabat

And that seems to be fine.
Thanks!

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

Attachment: 0001-gnu-scons-Update-to-2.5.1.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#27160: [PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1. Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:45:32 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Hi!
>
> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Here's a patch to update SCons.  I checked to make sure that the
>> packages that use SCons still build:
>> - linuxdcpp
>> - serf
>> - aria-maestosa
>> - pingus
>> - metabat
>>
>> And that seems to be fine.
>
> Good.
>
>>>From 54c0bec81ada0e0b035b88a41e1d33ae60ab1099 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Roel Janssen <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:57:41 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: scons: Update to 2.5.1.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/python.scm: Update to 2.5.1.
>                            ^
> Mention ‘scons’ here.

Whoops. Of course. :)

>
> Otherwise LGTM, thanks!
>
> Ludo’.

Thanks!  Pushed at 76ab314.

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]