--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH 01/11] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.80. |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2017 11:30:11 -0400 |
From: Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
* gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (libdrm): Update to 2.4.80.
---
gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm
index 89830a628..8d7f2195c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ rasterisation.")
(define-public libdrm
(package
(name "libdrm")
- (version "2.4.79")
+ (version "2.4.80")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ rasterisation.")
".tar.bz2"))
(sha256
(base32
- "15xiwnicf7vl1l37k8nj0z496p7ln1qp8qws7q13ikiv54cz7an6"))
+ "1wa9cnzf60xwx67zq9ay48xr3j3sn1z80q77jpbzmkg906b52am8"))
(patches (search-patches "libdrm-symbol-check.patch"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(inputs
--
2.13.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#26887: [PATCH 01/11] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.80. |
Date: |
Sat, 13 May 2017 19:36:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> These patches are intended for gnome-updates. The first three are merged
>>>>> from master. Also, the mutter patch is not functional yet, as it
>>>>> probably requires some updated package from master.
>>>>
>>>> I think it's better to merge master directly instead of cherry-picking
>>>> these patches. We'd want to do that before starting it on Hydra anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Would you like to do it? I think we can start building it shortly, Hydra
>>>> seems to have caught up with recent events. Maybe it'll be ready for the
>>>> release :)
>>>>
>>> I can merge master and put these on top, though I can't test my patches
>>> very quickly (building webkitgtk+ repeatedly on 10-year-old hardware \o/).
>>> If your computer(s) are faster, I'd be more than happy to let you finish
>>> this branch.
>>
>> I think these patches look fine (see other comments), at least up to
>> mutter. I'd suggest merging master and adding the patches leading to
>> it, as long as everyone is fine with adding wayland as a hard dependency
>> of gtk+.
>>
>> Then we can start an evaluation on Hydra to get some substitutes before
>> trying the mutter update :)
>
> Last call for objections to wayland as a hard dependency of gtk+ on the
> gnome-updates branch! This will be committed in approximately 24 hours
> otherwise.
The gnome-updates branch has been updated! I'll be closing all of my
related bugs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---