emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#25700: closed (Undeclared variable stack_top in li


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#25700: closed (Undeclared variable stack_top in libguile/continuations.c)
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:39:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:38:34 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#25700: Undeclared variable stack_top in 
libguile/continuations.c
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25700,
regarding Undeclared variable stack_top in libguile/continuations.c
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
25700: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25700
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Undeclared variable stack_top in libguile/continuations.c Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:17:53 +0100
Hello,


with the latest commit 8e1af70c2c4ccc7fb19afa48ffd4662f95bb0f66 from git I get

CC       libguile_2.2_la-continuations.lo
continuations.c: In function 'scm_i_continuation_to_frame':
continuations.c:186:7: error: 'stack_top' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
       stack_top = data->stack_bottom + data->stack_size;

So stack_top is still used, where latest commit's commit message says it is not.

Best Regards

Stefan Husmann



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#25700: Undeclared variable stack_top in libguile/continuations.c Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:38:34 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
On Mon 13 Feb 2017 07:17, address@hidden writes:

> with the latest commit 8e1af70c2c4ccc7fb19afa48ffd4662f95bb0f66 from git I get
>
> CC       libguile_2.2_la-continuations.lo
> continuations.c: In function 'scm_i_continuation_to_frame':
> continuations.c:186:7: error: 'stack_top' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
>        stack_top = data->stack_bottom + data->stack_size;
>
> So stack_top is still used, where latest commit's commit message says it is 
> not.

Yeah sorry about that.  Fixed :)

Andy


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]