emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#1819: closed (Anyone knows why the majority of win


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#1819: closed (Anyone knows why the majority of windowed proggies launched from an emacs shell doesn't show until the shell buffer is killed? [MSWindows])
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:10:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:09:04 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#1819: control message for bug #1819
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #1819,
regarding Anyone knows why the majority of windowed proggies launched from      
an emacs shell doesn't show until the shell buffer is killed?      [MSWindows]
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
1819: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1819
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Anyone knows why the majority of windowed proggies launched from an emacs shell doesn't show until the shell buffer is killed? [MSWindows] Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:56:03 +0100 (CET) User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
Anyone knows why the majority of windowed applications launched from an
emacs shell doesn't show until the shell buffer is killed? [MSWindows]

Try M-x shell <RET> notepad

Doesn't show anything on the computers I've tried until C-x k



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Busca, compara... pero busca con OZÚ
Descúbrelo en http://buscar.ozu.es
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Correo enviado desde http://www.ozu.es




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#1819: control message for bug #1819 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:09:04 +0200 User-agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.95.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Richard Copley <address@hidden> writes:

>> Should we close this bug report then?

> In my opinion, yes it should be closed. I'm not sure how bold I should be
> with control messages, as I have no particular standing in the community. I
> sometimes close and merge bugs that I reported. This one's not mine so I
> just tagged it.

I'm closing it then.  If needed, someone can reopen.

Nico

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]