emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#15254: closed ([PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#15254: closed ([PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 01:21:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:20:39 +0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#15254: [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15254,
regarding [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
15254: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15254
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:53:20 +0800
tags patch

I made a patch for glossary.texi, inspired by this thread:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-09/msg00020.html

This patch "hyperlinks directly to an explanation of the term in
question, rather than just saying "which see" or some such English
alternative to q.v.".

-- 
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#15254: [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:20:39 +0800
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Lars,

> Xue Fuqiao <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I made a patch for glossary.texi, inspired by this thread:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-09/msg00020.html
>>
>> This patch "hyperlinks directly to an explanation of the term in
>> question, rather than just saying "which see" or some such English
>> alternative to q.v.".
>
> I think we forgot to apply this patch -- it looks good to me.  But, of
> course, it no longer applies now, two years later.
>
> Could you respin the patch and re-send, and I'll apply it?

I'm not sure whether this patch is useful.  See the discussion starting
at: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-09/msg00048.html

BTW, I've been too busy these days, so I'll close this bug for now.

Thank you.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]