[debbugs-tracker] bug#21037: closed (24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:06 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#21037: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does 
nothing
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21037,
regarding 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
21037: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21037
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:18 -0400
>
>
>
>
> mkdir a b
> echo _ > a/foo.txt
> echo _ > b/foo.txt
> emacs -Q -l uniquify --eval "(setq uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p
> t)" a/foo.txt b/foo.txt
>
> I don't get asked any questions about buffer name. There are no
> references to uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p in uniquify.el except
> for the definition and in the "Change Log" comments.
>
> This option seems pretty useless to me (since the user can always
> rename any buffer at any time), so I think removing it would be fine.
> At any rate, having a non-functional option looks like a bug.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#21037: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:06 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> > I don't get asked any questions about buffer name. There are no
> > references to uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p in uniquify.el except
> > for the definition and in the "Change Log" comments.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > This option seems pretty useless to me (since the user can always
> > rename any buffer at any time), so I think removing it would be fine.
> > At any rate, having a non-functional option looks like a bug.
>
> Agreed, I just removed the defcustom.  Thank you,
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
> --- End Message ---