--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
25.0.50; Mode-line not redrawn with expose events |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:51:24 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
This bug is related to the mode-line erasure problem I mentioned in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-01/msg01040.html .
To reproduce the problem by the instruction below, you would need to
make sure that your X11 compositing manager is turned off. I tested
on Cent OS 5.11, default setting. See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-04/msg00600.html .
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a file (say, ~/test.el) containing the following contents:
(custom-set-faces
'(mode-line ((((class color) (min-colors 88)) (:background
"grey75" :foreground "black" :box (:line-width 2 :color
"grey75" :style released-button)))))
)
2. $ emacs -Q -D -l ~/test.el
3. C-x 2 C-x 2 C-x 2
4. C-x o C-x o C-x o
5. Move another window (e.g., the terminal window from which Emacs is
invoked) so that it hovers over the Emacs frame.
Result:
The upper two mode-lines among four are not redrawn after their hidden
part is revealed (see the attachment). They are not redrawn in
response to expose events because the flag `enabled_p' for these
mode-line glyph rows have been set to false.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.4)
of 2015-01-29 on localhost.localdomain
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.70101000
System Description: CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
Configured features:
XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG SOUND LIBSELINUX FREETYPE XFT ZLIB
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#19721: 25.0.50; Mode-line not redrawn with expose events |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:16:47 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:27:39 +0900
> From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> >>>>> On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 17:33:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
>
> > How about the patch below? (Once again, it's wrt the current emacs-24
> > branch.)
>
> This works fine on my side. Thanks.
Thanks, I pushed this as commit e9a7e10 to the emacs-24 branch.
--- End Message ---