emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#19390: closed (25.0.50; `package-activate' is too


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#19390: closed (25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow)
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:50:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:49:25 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19390,
regarding 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19390: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19390
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:34:50 +0200
Before c13baa10d55ec863d3ceaea48c6b2959ece98198, `package-initialize'
takes ~100 ms on my machine, with 92 packages.

After this revision, it takes ~7.7 seconds.

Provided there's no obvious low-hanging fruit for performance
improvement, we should at least avoid exercising the new logic when
Emacs is just launching. There's simply nothing to reload yet.

In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.8)
 of 2014-12-14 on axl
Repository revision: eaf25ad549dc5a9b26089f588e0a80268708a3d1
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11501000
System Description:     Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:49:25 +0200 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
On 12/18/2014 09:01 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote:
Sorry. The rest of the message was just babling anyway.
I was just saying the performance hit of the current implementation is
negligible when upgrading.
Which is the same thing Stefan is saying.

Oh well. I also wrote that my implementation is shorter and somewhat easier to read, but since no one else seems to think so, closing.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]