emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#16801: closed (24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#16801: closed (24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:49:03 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:48:09 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#16801: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16801,
regarding 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16801: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16801
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Exception 0xc0000005 at this address:
010e6b0a

Backtrace:
011fbd99
011fbe0a
010f043b
011149c4
0111499f
011149f8
010011e6
75f2fff7
77d674fb
77d29f41




In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2014-02-11 on ODIEONE
Bzr revision: 116410 address@hidden
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --prefix=/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=yes,glyphs
 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' LDFLAGS=-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib
 CPPFLAGS=-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include'



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#16801: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:48:09 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:56:02 +0100
> Cc: Drew Adams <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > What about that 1st address:
> 
> Sorry, my bad.

Nothing to be sorry about, and thanks for doing this.

> This is the full output:
> 
> ??
> ??:0
> cache_face at xfaces.c:4377

This is here:

  #ifdef GLYPH_DEBUG
    /* Check that FACE got a unique id.  */
    {
      int j, n;
      struct face *face1;

      for (j = n = 0; j < FACE_CACHE_BUCKETS_SIZE; ++j)
        for (face1 = c->buckets[j]; face1; face1 = face1->next)
          if (face1->id == i)  <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
            ++n;

      eassert (n == 1);
    }
  #endif /* GLYPH_DEBUG */

So I guess 'face1' is an invalid (but non-NULL) pointer.  I have no
idea how this could happen (anyone?), but since this is a debugging
code, I don't thinks it's too important to figure that out.

Closing.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]