emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#16094: closed (bug: cp/mv cannot copy/move a file'


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#16094: closed (bug: cp/mv cannot copy/move a file's extended attrs if they start with 'security')
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:25:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:24:01 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#16094: bug: cp/mv cannot copy/move a file's extended 
attrs if they start with 'security'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16094,
regarding bug: cp/mv cannot copy/move a file's extended attrs if they start 
with 'security'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16094: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16094
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: bug: cp/mv cannot copy/move a file's extended attrs if they start with 'security' Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:09:58 -0800 User-agent: Thunderbird
I saved a file to my home directory on linux via windows.

I wanted to move it to /tmp.

I got:
 mv  /home/law/tmp/oVars.pm /tmp
mv: setting attribute ‘security.NTACL’ for ‘security.NTACL’: Operation not permitted

So what's up with this? Shouldn't the NTACL be able to be stored/moved with the
file?





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#16094: bug: cp/mv cannot copy/move a file's extended attrs if they start with 'security' Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:24:01 +0000 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
tag 16094 notabug
stop

On 12/09/2013 08:09 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I saved a file to my home directory on linux via windows.
> 
> I wanted to move it to /tmp.
> 
> I got:
>>  mv  /home/law/tmp/oVars.pm /tmp
> mv: setting attribute ‘security.NTACL’ for ‘security.NTACL’: Operation not 
> permitted
> 
> So what's up with this?  Shouldn't the NTACL be able to be stored/moved with 
> the
> file?

This would be security policy enforced by the system I suspect.
I.E. mv is not filtering these explicitly.

thanks,
Pádraig.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]