--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
guard expression doesn't catch everything |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:29:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hello schemers,
the guard expression from (rnrs) would be a lot more useful if it
managed to catch all exceptions. As it is now, some errors will bypass
the guard:
scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
scheme@(guile-user)> (guard (exn (else #f)) (fx+ #f #f))
$1 = #f
scheme@(guile-user)> (guard (exn (else #f)) (fx+))
;;; <stdin>:3:0: warning: possibly wrong number of arguments to `fx+'
rnrs/arithmetic/fixnums.scm:153:2: In procedure fx+:
rnrs/arithmetic/fixnums.scm:153:2: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure fx+
(fx1 fx2)>
The background is that I'm working on a program that intentionally calls
procedures with bad arguments, and it needs to determine if the
procedure accepted the arguments or not. Ideally the object raised would
be a proper and correct R6RS condition object, but I suspect that most
of the existing Guile code doesn't raise conditions like that. I think
it would be a step forward if guard at least caught the exception, even
if the condition object might not be very useful.
Tested with Guile 2.0.9.40-824b-dirty.
Regards,
--
Göran Weinholt <address@hidden>
"Bring me back // to a story left untold // so we can write the ending."
-- Aly & Fila feat. Jwaydan - We Control The Sunlight
pgpQ5BUM_8hW2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: Improving R6RS exception handling in Guile |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2013 01:16:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Sorry for the long delay on this.
Göran Weinholt <address@hidden> writes:
> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've cooked up a patch to help improve R6RS exception handling in Guile.
>>
>> As noted by Göran Weinholt in <http://bugs.gnu.org/14922>, the R6RS
>> exception handlers in Guile are currently unable to catch native Guile
>> exceptions. To fix this, the basic approach of this patch is to convert
>> native Guile exceptions into R6RS conditions within the R6RS exception
>> handlers.
> [...]
>> I'd be grateful for any feedback.
>
> I think it's the right approach to take. I've tested the patch a little
> and it's an improvement over the current state of affairs.
I went ahead and pushed this patch to stable-2.0. We can work on
incrementally improving it from there.
I'm closing this bug <http://bugs.gnu.org/14922>.
Thanks!
Mark
--- End Message ---