--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
./configure && make && make install |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:43:44 +0800 |
I note a lot of packages come with
Installation Instructions
*************************
Copyright (C) 1994-1996, 1999-2002, 2004-2012 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
notice and this notice are preserved. This file is offered as-is,
without warranty of any kind.
Basic Installation
==================
Briefly, the shell commands `./configure; make; make install' should
configure, build, and install this package. The following
I think that should say
`./configure && make && make install'
Please tell whoever writes that file, as the file itself doesn't say. (Bad
also!)
Also maybe it should say
./configure && make && make install
All on its own line for easy cut and pasting...
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#15066: ./configure && make && make install |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:57:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 08/10/2013 01:43 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> I note a lot of packages come with
[...]
> Basic Installation
> ==================
>
> Briefly, the shell commands `./configure; make; make install' should
> configure, build, and install this package. The following
>
> I think that should say
> `./configure && make && make install'
Thanks for the report.
As you didn't say to what file you refer to, I'm assuming you refer
to the file './INSTALL'. That one is a symlink to gnulib:
$ ls -ldog
lrwxrwxrwx 1 18 Aug 1 03:38 INSTALL -> gnulib/doc/INSTALL
Therefore, it is maintained there.
However, that's not the end of the story, as gnulib regularly
syncs it from the autoconf project.
So if you want the want to have it changed, please report this
issue there. As the improvement will automatically make it's
way down to coreutils, I'm marking this bug as done.
> Please tell whoever writes that file, as the file itself
> doesn't say. (Bad also!)
As you see, that file is shared by many projects, and therefore
adding an author would not be beneficial.
Have a nice day,
Berny
--- End Message ---