[debbugs-tracker] bug#14731: closed (24.3.50; doc string of `search-invisible')

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:08:05 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#14731: 24.3.50; doc string of `search-invisible'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14731,
regarding 24.3.50; doc string of `search-invisible'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
14731: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14731
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; doc string of `search-invisible'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> The first line should say "non-nil" instead of "t":
>
> "If t incremental search can match hidden text."
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
>  of 2013-06-20 on ODIEONE
> Bzr revision: 113100 address@hidden
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
> Configured using:
>  `configure --prefix=/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=yes,glyphs
>  CFLAGS=-O0 -g3 LDFLAGS=-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib
>  CPPFLAGS=-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include'
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#14731: 24.3.50; doc string of `search-invisible'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:08:05 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> > "If t incremental search can match hidden text."
>
> I don't see any reason why non-nil would be better.
> People using non-nil non-t values are on their own,
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
> --- End Message ---