[debbugs-tracker] bug#13000: closed (24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:51:10 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13000: 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as 
other IDEs
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13000,
regarding 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13000: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13000
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:21:21 +0800

Thanks to Aurelien Aptel for implementing this feature. I have started
using it in flymake to indicate errors. However, I have noticed that it
doesn't look as good as that of, for example, the pycharm IDE. Here is a
screenshot comparison.

pycharm-wave.png
Description: pycharm-wave.png

emacs-wave.png
Description: emacs-wave.png

In the IDE the wave line is thinner and the ripple bigger. So it appears
clearly wave-like. In emacs, it looks too similar to a blurry straight
line.

Leo

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#13000: 24.2.90; underwave doesn't look as good as other IDEs
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:51:10 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> > These are good use cases for underwave. I wonder if they are ready to
> > install in trunk.
>
> Thanks for the reminder.  They are now installed in trunk.
>
>
> --- End Message ---