emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#13054: closed (Assume POSIX 1003.1-1988 or later f


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#13054: closed (Assume POSIX 1003.1-1988 or later for execve.)
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:22:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:19:50 -0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13054: Assume POSIX 1003.1-1988 or later for execve.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13054,
regarding Assume POSIX 1003.1-1988 or later for execve.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13054: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13054
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Assume POSIX 1003.1-1988 or later for execve. Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 22:37:39 -0600 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
Attached is a patch to simplify Emacs that I discovered while looking
into the putenv/setenv problem.  It affects the NT port so I'm
CC'ing this to Eli to give him a heads-up.

Attachment: execve.txt
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#13054: Assume POSIX 1003.1-1988 or later for execve. Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:19:50 -0800 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
On 12/02/2012 10:48 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> execvp is just a wrapper around execve
> There must be some other reason why execvp is used.

Perhaps the author of that part of Emacs simply
didn't know about execve.  That would explain things.

It sounds like the main issue here is about mentioning
POSIX in the ChangeLog, so I removed that, along with
removing the other stuff Eli asked to remove, and
installed it as trunk bzr 111064.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]