[debbugs-tracker] bug#12851: closed (Revert the change to ruby-move-to-block from 109576)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:30:14 +0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: Bug 12851
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12851,
regarding Revert the change to ruby-move-to-block from 109576
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12851: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12851
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Revert the change to ruby-move-to-block from 109576 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:15:36 +0400 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2

I want to commit this patch to emacs-24. Is that okay?

The change is not particularly useful by itself, it changes `ruby-beginning-of-block' and `ruby-backward-sexp' behavior (making things more complicated for third-party code), and, while fixing the round-trip problem (*) for "something do\nend", introduces it for "def foo\nend".

(*) When the point is at the end of block, we want (progn (ruby-beginning-of-block) (ruby-end-of-block)) to bring us back to where we were at the start.

ruby-move-to-block-revert.diff
Description: Text document

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: Bug 12851
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:30:14 +0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;	rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
>
>
>
>
> On 12.11.2012 3:03, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > Could you give me the go-ahead?
> > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12851
> >
> > Oh, sorry, yes please go ahead,
>
> Thanks, installed.
>
>
> --- End Message ---