[debbugs-tracker] bug#12412: closed (24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc files)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:23:24 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12412: 24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc 
files
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12412,
regarding 24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc files
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12412: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12412
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc files
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:08:14 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> I ran `make distclean' three times.  The first time it ran
> ./configure.  The second time it didn't run ./configure.  The
> third time it didn't run at all because of the absence of
> Makefile.
>
> Each time the lisp/*.elc files are left untouched/undeleted.
>
> I expected them to be deleted -- what am I doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10)
>  of 2012-09-10 on myhost
> Bzr revision: 109965 address@hidden
> Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11201000
> Important settings:
>   value of $LANG: fr_FR.UTF-8
>   locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
>   default enable-multibyte-characters: t
>
> -- 
>  Bastien
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#12412: 24.2.50; `make distclean' does not remove .elc files
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:23:24 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> (Yes, "You" did not mean "you, Bastien" :) )
>
> Bastien wrote:
>
> > I continue to think having a ̀make help' would spare everyone's time 
> > by answering such questions in advance.
>
> Since there is a separate report about that I'll close this one.
>
>
> --- End Message ---